The Evolutionists

The Evolutionists

Thomas Huxley, Henri Bergson, and Samuel Alexander

Syamasundara: He wants to search out what is the pattern of evolution, how it will go in the future, and he says that because man has progressed from the instinctive stage to the intelligent stage, and then to the intuitive stage, that he will obtain eventually the immortal stage, that he will become...
Prabhupada: That is nice. That immortal stage is described in the Bhagavatam, or the Bhagavad-gita. Yad gatva na nivartante. Progress means you go, go. Gamati iti gatih, or progress. You go, go, go. So when you come to this sloka... (?) Therefore in the Vedas it is said, om tad visnoh paramam padam sada pasyanti surayah. Surayah, means those who are learned, those who are advanced in knowledge. They are called surayah. So they are always looking forward to the lotus feet of Visnu. Just like modern scientists are going, trying to go to the moon planet, so when they start, they are looking forward (to) the moon planet. Similarly, those who are learned, they are simply looking forward to the lotus feet of Visnu: "When I shall reach there?" That goal is there. They are not missing the goal. Om tad visnoh paramam padam sada pasyanti surayah. This is the Rg Veda mantra. They know their goal. But they have to reach still, yet to go there. Just like our Krsna conscious people, they know what is the goal, Krsna, Goloka Vrndavana. So this is the attempt, how to reach there, how to reach there. That's all. We are not blind, but these people are blind. They do not know what is the goal. By philosophizing, they simply mislead. That is explained in the Bhagavata: andha, a blind man is trying to lead other blind men. If you do not know, why you are philosophizing? Unless you have got the ideal goal for evolutionary progress, why you talk of these things? What do you think? Huh? So that is explained in the Bhagavata. Andha yathandhair upaniyamanas. Andha. One blind man is trying to lead another blind man. So what is the use of such leading? You must have eyes; then you can ask other hundreds of blind men, "Please come behind me. I shall get you across." But if you have no eyes, then why you are asking others? Philosophizing.
Syamasundara: It seems like these two philosophers have two different viewpoints. The first one, Huxley, said man can take nature into his own hand and mold his own evolution.
Prabhupada: That is nonsense.
Syamasundara: Whereas this philosopher thinks that we should just..., that the vital force is guiding everyone and creating its own evolution, that we should just drift in the course of things and the vital force will determine history or will determine our future.
Prabhupada: Yes. Vital force will determine. That is somewhat...
Syamasundara: Without our doing, without anything of our doing.
Prabhupada: No. Vital force must know how to make progress how to do it. Then he'll be... If he does not know how to do it, how it will be possible? Can you do anything? Suppose you are learning some mechanical business, can you do it without direction? You have to learn. You must get a teacher. So without teacher, that is not possible.
Syamasundara: Just like the seasons. If we just place ourselves in the seasons, they take us toward something, towards  springtime.
Prabhupada: That's all right. But you cannot compare. The analogy is mistaken. The season is matter, material changes. But the evolution is not matter. There is spirit soul. He is making his evolution. So he has got independence. He can reject and accept. Just like yesterday we were talking... (plane overhead) ...Krsna. Krsna says that "You give up everything, just surrender unto Me," but because you are living entity, you can reject this proposal or accept this proposal. Not that blindly you have to surrender to Krsna. No. That is not possible. The proposal is there, but it is up to you to surrender or not to surrender. Otherwise why Krsna says that "You do it." If it is automatically, then there was no need of Krsna's saying, "Do it." It would have come automatically to the surrendering point. Not like that. They are mistaken in that. The living entity has got the right to accept or reject. So if he takes, he makes his progress, accepting the right path, then he comes to the goal. But if he rejects, he'll not reach the goal (?). That depends on him.
Syamasundara: So this philosopher Bergson, he sees two types of morality. The "closed morality," which is the compulsive forms of behavior, which conform to prevailing convention or social pressure or tradition; static morality, one simply follows the tradition blindly.
Prabhupada: That can be changed according to the... Just like in some scriptures it is said that "Thou shall not kill." So the killing is ordinary thing there. But in some society killing is already prohibited by so much culture that they do not want to kill even an ant. So that depends on education of the particular society. It is not static, that "This will be like this." No. Not like that. "One man's food another man's poison." What is morality in one society, it may be immorality in another society.
Syamasundara: Yes. So the other type of morality he calls "open morality." This is determined by individuals in a dynamic way, blazing new trails, guided by...
Prabhupada: As soon as it is invented by individual men or society, this is all rascaldom. It has no value.
Syamasundara: He calls it "the higher morality." Just like St. Paul or some great saint receives inspiration from God and he blazes a new trail to morality in a society.
Prabhupada: That is nice. Because he is God conscious, he can dictate what is real morality.
Syamasundara: He's speaking of the case of St. Paul.
Prabhupada: So St. Paul, he's a sadhu. So our process is that: sadhu-guru-sastra. We have to accept everything through saintly person, confirmed by the scripture, and described or explained by guru. Then it is perfect. The scriptures are already there, and we have to see how the scriptures are being followed by saintly persons. And if there is any difficulty, they should be explained by the spiritual master. Then it is perfect. Sadhu-guru-sastra-vakya, tinete kariya aikya. Scriptures you cannot understand directly. Then you have to see how the scriptural injunctions are being followed by saintly persons. Even if you cannot understand, then the spiritual master will explain to you.
Syamasundara: And he sees also in the same way two types of religion. He sees the static religion and he calls this static religion "myth devised by human intelligence as a means of defense against the depressing experiences of life. Being fearful of the future, man attempts to combat his fate by constructing religious myths."


Prabhupada: Just that... Anything created by human being, that is not acceptable. We do not follow that principle. Because a human being is always imperfect. So we cannot take anything manufactured, myth, by any human being. We take directly from God. Srimad-Bhagavatam, dharmam tu saksad bhagavat-pranitam. The religious principles, they are given directly by God. Just like Krsna says, "This is religion: surrender unto Me." This is religion. It is not man-manufactured. Man is manufacturing, "Oh, this is my type of religion. It is Muhammadanism." "This is Hinduism." "This is Christianism." All these isms, they are imperfect, man-made. But this is perfect. This is perfect because it is given by God Himself. Dharmam tu saksad bhagavat... Very simple thing. "You surrender unto Me." That's all. So any religious system which leads the follower to this point, surrendering to God, that is religion. Otherwise bogus. Real religion is this, surrender to God. So any system of religion, it doesn't matter whether Hinduism, Christianism, Muhammadanism, if it teaches ultimately surrender to God, then that is perfect religion. Otherwise it is not religion.
Syamasundara: He says that the opposite of static religion is dynamic religion. He says that this type of religion...
Prabhupada: Dynamic because he has no idea of God and God consciousness. He thinks it is dea..., static. But they can see practically. We are Krsna conscious, how much activities we have got. Deny it. So he does not know what is God, what is religion, and he is philosopher. You see?
Syamasundara: He says that... He would probably call our type of religion dynamic religion.
Prabhupada: Dynamic, yes.
Syamasundara: But there is also a type that is static religion.
Prabhupada: Static religion... Religion is not static because religion (?) (ritual?) is on the spiritual platform. The spiritual platform is not static because the spirit is the dynamic force in this body. So when it is uncontaminated by this material body, then how it can be static? Because the spirit soul is there within the body, therefore my body is moving.
Syamasundara: But, for instance, in ancient Greece, they fabricated so many myths, mythology...
Prabhupada: Well, that I have already answered. Anything manufactured by man, that is not religion. That is not religion. That I have already explained. Religion is not manufactured, but it is given by God. That is our point. God is giving religion, "Here is religion. Surrender unto Me." So any religious system may be different in method, but ultimately, if it comes to this point, surrendering to God, then it is religion. Otherwise, it is not religion. Reject it.
Syamasundara: He says that prompted by this vital impulse, the human will identifies with the divine will in a mystical union...
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: ...and that this is real religion.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is our Krsna consciousness. We are teaching people that you agree with the divine will. The divine will is that you surrender. So you agree. You surrender. That we are teaching. That is real religion.
Syamasundara: He says that real religion is a mystic oneness with God.
Prabhupada: That is... Yes. Oneness means I agree with God. God  says your surrender. I say, "Yes. I surrender." God says Arjuna "You fight," he fights. That is oneness, that we have no disagreement in any point with God. That is oneness. Just like in this institution, our Krsna consciousness, as soon as I say anything, there is no disagreement of any other disciple. If there is disagreement, then it is ended. Disobedient immediately. As it is going, it is being done, taking God's representative, Krsna's representative, so similarly with God also. And what, what I am doing? I am simply taking the order from God and I am disseminating the same knowledge. I have accepted that surrender to Krsna is my life. I am teaching others, "You also surrender." This is called disciplic succession. There is no disagreement with God. It is not that I am posing myself, "I am God."
Syamasundara: What does it mean, "mystic oneness with God"? What does mystic mean?
Prabhupada: Mystic means spiritual. What is the mystic? What is the meaning of?
Syamasundara: "Mystic means known only to those of special comprehension or especially initiated." Known only to those with special comprehension.
Prabhupada: What is that? Yes.
Syamasundara: So Bergson believed that this mystic who had contacted God, that he can lead others and he can teach others how to become godly.
Prabhupada: That's it. God's representative. That we are. That is disciplic succession. Yes. That is spiritual... He is accepting spiritual master. He is accepting spiritual master. And that is the definition in the sastra.

                     tasmad gurum prapadyeta
                      jijnasuh sreya uttamam
                      sabde pare ca nisnatam
                      brahmany upasamasrayam

One who has realized God, you go to such spiritual master to understand the spiritual science. The Bhagavad-gita also... That is our word, that you should approach... What does he say? That word?
Syamasundara: The mystic teaches us how to become godly.
Prabhupada: How to become godly. That's right.
Syamasundara: He says how to become God.
Prabhupada: Who?
Syamasundara: This man. In the sense of godly, how to become God.
Prabhupada: All right. That can be accepted. But a better word is how to become godly or God conscious. That is the exact word.  Syamasundara: This definition in the dictionary for mystic is "known only to those of special comprehension or especially initiated."
Prabhupada: Yes. Yes. That means one who is God conscious. He is mystic.
Syamasundara: But the modern interpretation of the word mystic is something different. People take "mystic" to mean someone who is very mysterious and magic.
Prabhupada: Yes. It has come to that. God consciousness... Just like at the present moment, if a guru can show some miracles, just like that Sai Baba, (laughter) so they accept that he's mystic. Yes.
Syamasundara: Yes. That's the modern meaning of mystic.
Prabhupada: Yes. Although it may be rascaldom, false, still,  he's received like that. Miracles. That means less intelligent class of men, they want to see some miracles. That is mysticism.
Syamasundara: And he says that God means love and the creative... Through creative love the world came into being, and the world is a manifestation of God's love.
Prabhupada: Yes. God loves. Because unless He loves, why does He come personally? Why He gives instruction through scriptures? (break)
Syamasundara: So today we are discussing a philosopher named Samuel Alexander. He is the philosopher of emergent evolution. The last of the evolutionists we'll be discussing. His philosophy begins with the idea that objects, external objects, have an independent existence. They do not depend on consciousness for their existence. This is the opposite of many philosophers we have discussed who have said that nothing exists unless it is perceived. But this philosopher says something may exist even though it is not perceived. Even though there is no conscious life to observe, it still exists. Objects exist independently of perception.
Prabhupada: Yes. Just like God exists, either you perceive or not perceive. Is that all right? God, creator. Just like everyone has got father, so all living entities coming originally from a father. So you perceive or not perceive, it doesn't matter. But a father was there or is there. Is that all right?
Syamasundara: Yes. Suppose if nobody perceives an object. Say, like...
Prabhupada: Yes. Even nobody perceives, the fact is fact. Nobody has seen my father, but everyone knows that I had a father. It is not necessary that who accepts that I had a father, or I have a father, it is not necessary that he has to see my father by direct perception. But because I exist, therefore my father is essential. That is understood by everyone. Just like somebody asks, some friend asks some friend, "What is your father's name?" That means he assumes that he has got a father. Otherwise how does he say, ask, "What is your father's name?" First of all, you should have asked, "Have you got a father?" Then ask his name. But without asking this inquiry, whether he has got a father or not, he simply asks, "What is the name of your father?" Then it is assumed that he has a father. So he does not see his father, but immediately perceives that he has a father.
Syamasundara: He uses the example of a house, that if I become conscious of a house, the house itself is a real entity, unaffected by my consciousness of it. It exists, objectively, real, whether I see it or not. He says that the...
Prabhupada: But in that proposition... And if we accept that we are eternal, so it is very natural to assume that we have got eternal home. That is back to Godhead, back to home. Is it not?
Syamasundara: If we were born someplace, that is our home, normally...
Prabhupada: No. The thing is... Just like I have come to this house. This is not my own house, but everyone knows that I have got a house. It may be where it is. Therefore sometimes they ask, "Where, what is your residence?"
Syamasundara: Yes. "Where is your home?" That usually refers to where you were born.
Prabhupada: Or where I live. That's all. Not necessarily. "What is your address?" That present address may not be my birthplace, but I live somewhere. That's a fact. Nobody is interested to know where I live, but everyone knows that I have got a living place.
Syamasundara: Many people ask, "Where do you come from?"

Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: "Where is your origin?"
Prabhupada: "What is your birthplace?"
Syamasundara: Yes. So this Samuel Alexander says that our consciousness of an object is a mere perspective on something, but it's a real portion of that object and not just a mental image. In other words, if I see a table, I am actually reacting with that table. It is a real perspective. It's not just a mental image, but I'm actually reacting to that table. My senses are reacting with the table. It's an objective reality.
Prabhupada: Where is the table?
Syamasundara: Yes. Some philosophers think that if I see the table, it's merely a mental idea in my mind, that table. He says that no, there is a real objective relationship between my senses and the table, reality of the table. Is that...
Prabhupada: Yes. That is right.
Syamasundara: That's right?
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: It's not just a mental image.
Prabhupada: No, not mental. If the table is thrown upon me, I will fall. Then we cannot say that it is mental image. And it hurts me and blood oozes out; then it is not mental.
Syamasundara: He says that even illusions are genuinely real objects which are uncreated by the human mind. In other words, if I think I see a snake and it is actually a piece of rope, but if I think it is a snake, then it really is a snake.
Prabhupada: That is reality of a snake; otherwise how this imagination comes to me? I have got an idea of snake. Now, in darkness there is a rope. So I may falsely take it as snake. That's doesn't matter. But snake is there. That is our argument.
Syamasundara: He says that the mind never creates anything new. It simply rearranges things. Everything already exists...
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: ...but the mind, and the mind merely arranges it. It doesn't create anything new.
Prabhupada: Yes. Just like the economic law says that you cannot create anything. You simply transform. Just like this table is nothing but wood. So wood is not my creation. Wood is there, but I have transformed the wood into a state which is called a table.
Syamasundara: So that newness or novelty is merely rearranging. Something new, they say, "Oh, he has created something new." But it is merely a rearrangement of previously existing things.
Prabhupada: That is that English proverb, "Necessity is the cause of invention." I require something to sit down, leaning back side, so I create a chair which is called armchair. So I sense first of all a necessity that "I must sit down very comfortably leaning towards the back." So under such spirit I make this chair, and this is called armchair. So necessity is the mother of invention.
Syamasundara: So all new things are created out of necessity?
Prabhupada: New things means I create a necessity, and then, according to the plan of the necessity, the thing is there. Just like dictaphone. I feel inconvenience to dictate or the secretary has no time to take my dictation. So I may feel that "If I keep record of my dictation, the secretary will take it later on according to his convenience." So therefore the invention of a dictaphone.
Syamasundara: Yet many philosophers would say that this is the reason that religion has come about, that man feels a necessity  for God, so he invents God.
Prabhupada: Yes. Not invents. He knows God. This is natural. Just like if a sane man is there, so who is the original father? Huh? Just like I have got a father. Everyone knows. My father has a father. His father's father's father... Then who is the original father?
Syamasundara: So he can invent his original father.
Prabhupada: No. He can simply know by this philosophical research who is the original father. And the Vedanta-sutra also says, "God is He who is the original father of everything." Janmady asya yatah.
Syamasundara: In a sense, the man is not really inventing a chair either. There is already an idea of chair previously existing. He's just discovering it, something which already exists. Is that correct?
Prabhupada: Yes, in that sense, that I am feeling the necessity of armchair. My predecessors, they might have felt that chair, they invented. But at the present moment, my predecessor is also gone, the chair is also gone. So invention means the things which I create that was not in existence. That is called invention?
Syamasundara: Hm.
Prabhupada: And discovery: The thing is already there; I simply find it out. So invention and discovery practically convey the same idea.
Syamasundara: Yes. Because actually nothing is new. If I...
Prabhupada: That is discovery.
Syamasundara: If I invent something...
Prabhupada: Similarly, in case of God, it is discovery. It is not invention. It is discovery.
Syamasundara: Yes. Just like the idea of a chair is already there in nature. Nature provides a chair.
Prabhupada: Nature provides a sitting place. Just like when there is a slab of stone anywhere, I wish to sit down on it. Psychology. Then the next proposal is, "Why not invent something at my home? It is here in a... I cannot take it." You can say the idea was there already, to sit down on a high place comfortably. So I come home and make a chair according to that idea.
Syamasundara: He says that the mind is an emergent, that is, it creates a new organization out of existing things. It emerges new things out of old things. This comes from the idea of evolution.
Prabhupada: Just like there is gold and there is mountain. So I make a golden mountain. Gold is there, mountain is there. I combine together and make an imagination, golden mountain. Is that like that?
Syamasundara: Yes. Similar to that.
Prabhupada: The things are there. We mix up. So many things. The things are there and I mix up with something else and it can be called an invention.
Syamasundara: So then he tries to describe what is this mind. The mind is emergent. It can rearrange things and create new things, arrange new things.
Prabhupada: Mind creates some idea and again rejects it. It creates another idea. That is mind's business. He is not satisfied by creating something as final. Mind is creative. He creates something and he thinks, "Oh, this is not..." Just like you were making some doll (door?). You don't like it. Again you break it. Then again do it nicely, "Oh, it is not right." Then again break it. That is mind's business.
Syamasundara: Accepts and rejects.
Prabhupada: Reject.

Syamasundara: He says that the mind has two functions also, but he describes them slightly different. He says that first one is contemplation, that is perceiving the qualities of an object. And this is a, it's called a neurological activity. In other words, when the nerve endings in the body react with the qualities of an object. If an object is red, my nerve ending perceives that it is red. This is the object.
Prabhupada: Just like if there is a tamarind, immediately there is saliva in my tongue.
Syamasundara: (laughs) This is what he calls contemplation.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: And then the second function of the mind is enjoyment, where there is a mental awareness of an inner, physiological activity as a result of the contemplation.
Prabhupada: Yes. There are so many examples. Just like one man dreams some woman and there is nocturnal discharges. Mind creates like that and there is physical action actually. Mind creates a dream, a tiger, and there is physical action. He is crying loudly, "Here is a tiger. Here is a tiger." Actually, there is no tiger.
Syamasundara: His idea is that even these mental images in dreams are real, that they have an objective reality.
Prabhupada: Yes. Objective reality. When I dream of a woman or a tiger, there is objective reality. In dream it may be. There may be no existence of woman or tiger, but there is real existence of tiger, my dreaming. The impression of a tiger in my mind, the impression of a woman in my mind is created as hallucination, and that reacts on my physical life.
Syamasundara: He says that even these mental objects have a real existence in my consciousness. As long as I'm thinking there's a tiger about to pounce on me...
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: ...there is a tiger. There is a real object in my consciousness.
Prabhupada: And because it is real object, it is reacting on my physical life.
Syamasundara: He describes ultimate reality as space-time. Space and time. He says that time is an infinity of instants, single instants, and that the basis of infinity is a point, and that these two are combined and this is called reality.
Prabhupada: Infinity of?
Syamasundara: Point.
Prabhupada: Points and?
Syamasundara: Infinity of instants.
Prabhupada: Instinct.
Syamasundara: Instant. Like a moment is an instant.
Prabhupada: Yes. Hm.
Syamasundara: So he calls this ultimate reality. Time and space.
Prabhupada: Yes. Time is... We take it reality, time. That we accept also. Time is eternal. Reality. And therefore we take time as another feature of God.
Syamasundara: And space?
Prabhupada: Space is later created.
Syamasundara: Oh, after time. Oh. And it creates the ultimate reality?
Prabhupada: No. No. Space is also reality. Space is prakrti. Prakrti, kala, jiva, and Bhagavan. They are all reality.
Syamasundara: Oh. Those four things.
Prabhupada: Yes.

Syamasundara: Oh. He leaves out entity and Bhagavan. He only has time and space in the ultimate reality.
Prabhupada: Our philosophy... We see that one ultimate creator, Bhagavan. And jivatma, subsequent creator. God has created wood; I create a table and chair. I am subsequent. I am not ultimate creator. So jivatma is subsequent creator. Both the creators are eternal. And because the creation has got time connection, past, present, and future, so time is eternal. Time is eternal and jiva is eternal and prakrti.
Syamasundara: Prakrti means space?
Prabhupada: Prakrti means elements. Space is sky. Space is sky. So sky is one of the fundamental factors of prakrti, space.
Syamasundara: Anything which occupies space.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: So there is even spiritual space?
Prabhupada: Oh yes. Otherwise, how there is spiritual world? The ingredient is different. Otherwise, they're exactly the same. Just like you create plastic tree like this. The plastic tree and this tree, ingredients are the same. The same, that earth, water, air. What is this plastic? It is also a kind of earth. Is it not? You mix with water and put a shape and heat it, it becomes glass and this and that, so many things. Similarly, the whole material creation is also combination and permutation... What is called?
Syamasundara: Yes.
Prabhupada: Of these five elements. Especially earth, water and fire. Just like this brick What is this brick? Earth, water, mix and put it into fire. It is brick.
Syamasundara: (aside:) Should I turn it off? (?)
Prabhupada: And you crush this brick, it becomes mortar. And mix with lime and water. Then it becomes cementing plaster, and put the bricks after bricks with that cement and it becomes house. So ultimately earth, water, and fire. Tejo-vari-mrdam vinimayam, exchange of earth, water, and fire.
Syamasundara: And he says that nothing remains at rest, that everything is in perpetual transition.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is accepted. That is called jagat. Gacchati. Everything is going on, forward. That is called jagat.
Syamasundara: Even the activities of the spiritual world are like that?
Prabhupada: No. Spiritual world is different. We are speaking of material world. In spiritual world the activity is eternal. In material world activity is not eternal.
Syamasundara: But motion, the motion is eternal because everything is moving.
Prabhupada: Motion is interaction of the three qualities. Just like you put soda and alkali, alkali and acid together, there is a reaction, effervescence. So both of them are material, but in due course of time it reacts, and then creation takes place.
Syamasundara: What about activities in the spiritual sky, beyond...?
Prabhupada: Activities of the spiritual sky, that is eternal. Everything is eternal there.
Syamasundara: But... Isn't there motion?
Prabhupada: Yes. Why not motion? Because there is living entities. Living entities means life force. There must be motion.
Syamasundara: This is his idea: all of creation means motion. There is motion everywhere.
Prabhupada: Yes. Without motion, how there can be creation? This is called ksobha. Nothing is created without motion.

Syamasundara: So he says that he wants to find some categories which define the characteristics of everything, that everything possesses these things in common.
Prabhupada: That five elements: earth, water, fire, air... Anything you take, these things are there. And subtler things: mind, intelligence, and ego. As it is stated in the Bhagavad-gita that these eight kinds of material elements are differentiated energy of Krsna.
Syamasundara: His categories are a little more abstract. He says that the primary category is motion.
Prabhupada: But wherefrom the motion comes? That is insufficient knowledge. When you... Motion means somebody must move, push on. That is accepted by Professor Einstein. If somebody has pushed, the motion has begun. Now it is going on. Just like in the billiard table, push one ball, "Hut!" And it goes.
Syamasundara: Yes. So he says that there are four major categories besides the primary category of motion and they are 1) identity or diversity. Each thing has a personal identity, an individuality, and each thing is different from every other thing.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is called sajatiya-vijatiya bheda in Sanskrit. Different... Sajatiya. Just like two trees, two mango trees, but still there is difference. They are one as mango tree, but this tree is different from that tree. Similarly, the fingers. As finger they are one, but this finger is different from this finger. Although sajati. Sajati means of the same category, but there is difference. Although the same category, finger, but this finger is bigger than this finger. The whole body. It's a part of the body. Hand is different from leg. Leg is different from his head. Head is different from palm. Palm is different from sole. There are so many differences. They are called sajati vijati.
Syamasundara: So the one characteristic that they all have is that they are individuals, that they are individual.
Prabhupada: Yes. One characteris... One is substance, another is character, character.
Syamasundara: Category.
Prabhupada: Category, yes.
Syamasundara: So the second thing that he sees that characterizes everything, that all things possess in common, is existence, or being.
Prabhupada: That is five elements. Just like there are differences between tree and your body, my body, but this body is made of the five elements: earth, water, air, fire. The tree is also made of the same elements, earth, water, air, fire... The aquatic body, fish's body, is also made of the same ingredients. Only difference is that one ingredient is prominent, other ingredients... Therefore you can take up this fact that there are living entities in the sun. The sun, because it appears fiery, you cannot exist. Your body cannot exist in the fire. But it does not mean there cannot be somebody whose body itself is fire. How can you deny it? And body being fiery, he can stay in the fiery planet of the same temperature.
Syamasundara: So the third and fourth categories he sees that relates to everything are relations and order. Everything relates to everything else and there is an order in everything. Everything is part of an order, a grand order.
Prabhupada: Oh, yes. Prakrti, there is order. Just like the sun is rising exactly in time. It is setting exactly in time. The sea waves, they are forbidden, "Not to come beyond this limit." Big, big waves are always coming, "Ohn, ohn!" but not beyond  this beach (reach?). So there is order. Everything there is order.
Syamasundara: Even the mind occupies space and transpires in time. Mind occupies space and works in time. Is that also a fact?
Prabhupada: Yes. We are occupying space. That's a fact.
Syamasundara: The mind also occupies space?
Prabhupada: Yes. Because I am occupying space, mind is within me. Why not? Mind occupying space, it can be practically experienced. The mind runs immediately, thousand miles away.
Syamasundara: But is that thousand miles away in me or does my mind actually travel there.
Prabhupada: Travels.
Syamasundara: Oh. So it occupies space.
Prabhupada: Yes. Unless... Suppose... You don't exactly remember now. The mind is going. As soon as reaches, then you can remember. It takes a second, but still, it occupies...
Syamasundara: So the mind leaves this body and goes somewhere.
Prabhupada: Not leave. It is just like a suit (shoot?).
Syamasundara: Oh, it extends.
Prabhupada: Extends.
Syamasundara: He says that whatever exists is subject to...
Prabhupada: At night also, the body also extends and again comes... You forget this body; you are dreaming some body, some other feature of the body. So sometimes you take that body very important.
Syamasundara: He says that whatever exists is subject to space and time and to these categories. However, evolution is progressing and new emergents appear in all the qualities which are envisioned to the mystic qualities. That the living entity, or life, he says that it could evolve into new things, other things, other than what we know about because it is continually emerging, evolution is continually emerging to something new.
Prabhupada: So?
Syamasundara: Does this follow with...
Prabhupada: What is the conclusion?
Syamasundara: The conclusion is that everything is evolving into ever newer and newer forms, and in the future that...
Prabhupada: Old order changes, yielding place to new. This law?
Syamasundara: Yes. But this new form which may appear in the future, we may have no idea about it now. We may not be able to say what it is, what it will be like.
Prabhupada: No. We don't think like that. We know that the days are going on. As we have experienced past, summer season and winter season, then forward also, we can say in such and such month there will be summer season. In such and such month there will be winter season. Either you take it from book or take it from our past experience, the things are there.
Syamasundara: So in the future there may be nothing unpredictable appearing, such as an entire new form of existence or something like this.
Prabhupada: No. Why? In future... Just like seasonal changes. There will be winter season. So what is the wonder there? I have got past experience of winter, so I am saying that "In such and such month there will be winter."
Bhavananda: Of course, it could come about that there was no winter. A point could be reached, he's saying, that where there would be no winter.
Syamasundara: Where winter may disappear.
Bhavananda: Disappear or, they say the experience on this planet  is that one time summer stopped and that everything became covered with ice. I have no experience with that.
Prabhupada: Huh?
Syamasundara: Just like in the past they say there was an ice age when there was no summer, no heat, and everything became ice, so in the future..., I cannot predict... Evolution may carry the events into some entirely strange new way, novel combination. Like winter may disappear or summer may disappear or...
Prabhupada: No.
Bhavananda: Or a new species may come out.
Syamasundara: A new type of man.
Prabhupada: No. No. That is not possible. Everything is there. That is the Vedic version. They say that so many species in the water, so many species on land, so many moving... It is all fixed up. There is no question of increasing or decreasing.
Bhavananda: But they have predicted a species of man, a type of man in the future who would have no hair on his body and whose head would be very, very big because of an increased brain capacity, but whose body would be atrophied. The arms and legs of the man they predict in the future is going to become more and more secondary.
Prabhupada: Who predicted? Who is that fool? (laughter)
Syamasundara: They say that man will lose some of his toes because he will cease activities, his activity will become...
Prabhupada: This is another foolishness. It has never become, neither it will be.
Bhavananda: Man has always had five toes.
Prabhupada: That's right.
Bhavananda: And he always will. However, is there, if there is a species of a type of men that have eight toes on each foot, he's always had eight toes on each foot. He might not be on this planet.
Prabhupada: We don't care any such things.
Syamasundara: His idea is that man may evolve to a demigod platform in the future.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: That he will have super consciousness, this and that.
Prabhupada: That is explained in the Bhagavad-gita. Yanti deva-vrata devan. If you become fond of the demigods, you go to the demigods. Pitrn yanti pitr-vratah. You can go to the Pitrloka. Or bhutejya, you can remain in this material world.
Syamasundara: His idea is that evolution is passed through five stages. In the beginning there was merely space and time and the categories, this object. Then there was a development of primary qualities through multiple sense perception. In other words, living entities began to perceive objects through different sense perceptions. Then there was the secondary qualities were developed through perception by one organ. In other words, out of a multiple sense quality, an eye developed, a nose developed, a mouth developed.
Prabhupada: That is the process of body. I have explained several times that after the secretion of the male and the female, they together emulsify and forms a pealike body. And that develops into this body. Gradually, there are holes. The holes become eyes, ears, nose, rectum, like that. So when the body, creation of body is complete, then the child comes out.
Syamasundara: He says that after the secondary sense perceptions are developed, then life develops and then mind develops.

Prabhupada: Mind is also created. That we admit.
Syamasundara: So he says that in this way there are...
Prabhupada: Mind, ego, intelligence, everything is created of elements.
Syamasundara: This, parallel to this is the idea is first there were the ingredients of nature, then there was very simple forms of life, then more developed forms of life, then human life. And he says in the next stage will be deity life or demigod life. And in this sixth level of life, he says that men will be able to more than just enjoy the qualities of mental experience, that they will be able to contemplate things as they are. They will be able to contemplate rather than just enjoy. They will be able to contemplate.
Prabhupada: Now let us stop. We shall discuss tomorrow. (break)
Syamasundara: Yesterday we were discussing this philosophy of emergent evolution. The theory behind it is in the beginning there was merely space and time and categories and then this developed to a level of primary sense perception, then to a level of secondary sense perception, then to a level of organic life, and then to a level of mind, mental life. And now, his theory is that the next level will be called deity, or a sort of demigod level of consciousness, in which men will be able to not only enjoy the objects of contemplation but be able to contemplate them, really, (?) in reality.
Prabhupada: So that is Vedic process.
Syamasundara: His idea is that all of evolution is going that way, nature is tending that way. And nature has progressed in different steps from inorganic life to organic life, to mental life, and now to demigod life.
Prabhupada: From organic... Inorganic life? What is that inorganic life?
Syamasundara: Space and time and the categories of...
Prabhupada: Where is the life there?
Syamasundara: Life develops from inorganic matter is his theory. It is merely a higher level of organization, inorganic life.
Prabhupada: That means life developed from matter?
Syamasundara: Yes.
Prabhupada: That is nonsense. How life develops from matter? Where is the, evidence? Why do they not manufacture life from matter in the laboratory? It is simply a statement. It has no value. Because you cannot produce living force from matter. Matter is different and living force, soul, is different. (In) one sense, of course, they are the energy of God, but still, categorically, they are different. So far these materialists are concerned, where is the proof that from matter, life has developed? So why they do not manufacture life in the laboratory? Even an ant you cannot manufacture. You have got all the chemicals. Why don't you manufacture life? So this theory cannot be accepted.
Syamasundara: They trace back... Their so-called evidence is just mostly see that geological calculations. They see that at a certain period... They go further down into the earth's surface.
Prabhupada: That's all right.
Syamasundara: All kinds of life disappear and there is simply rock. And they say the beginning was merely rock and water; then organic life came out.
Prabhupada: No. That is not organic life. The soul appears in different ways. One of the ways is by fermentation, perspiration. So rock and water, when it is decomposed there is fermentation  and there is possibility of soul taking advantage and come out with a body. In any case, from matter life never comes. It is compared with... Tandula-vrscika-nyaya. A vrscika, a scorpion, is coming out from rice. Actually, a scorpion down lays eggs within the heaps of rice, and by fermentation of the rice, heating, the egg, I mean to say, produces a small scorpion, and it comes out from the rice. So foolish people, they think that the heaps of rice is the cause of producing a scorpion. So many things come like that, but that does not mean the matter is producing life. If matter is producing life, the modern science, so much advanced, so let them prove in the laboratory, mixing some matter, life is coming. That fermentation, that is accepted in the Vedic language. By fermentation living creatures come out.
Syamasundara: So it is only because the soul finds refuge there.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: What about this idea that nature...
Prabhupada: Mister (indistinct).
Syamasundara: Yes.
Prabhupada: Give him one asana.
Syamasundara: That nature is progressing. What about this idea that nature, or evolution, is progressing?
Prabhupada: The same nonsense idea. Evolution is not progressing. Everything is there, but it is being manifested when the living soul takes shelter.
Syamasundara: But do you think that there will become a level of demigods, a race of demigods?
Prabhupada: Yes. Demigods, according to Vedic system, demigods... (Hindi:) Aiye. Demigods were created before man was created. (Hindi:) Aiye. Jaya. Demigods, just like demigod, Lord Brahma, he was first created. From Brahma, Lord Siva was created. Then... Created means born, not created. So similarly, from Brahma, other, Daksa, he was created, so many, one after..., Prajapatis, then Manus.
Syamasundara: So even before inorganic life there was...
Prabhupada: There is no such thing, from inorganic life. Inorganic life... Suppose just like Brahma is coming from the navel of Visnu. So where is the... We don't get any information. Visnu is origin, and from Visnu, Brahma came. From Brahma, other demigods came, other animals came. They create animals and others. The first created being is Brahma, the most intelligent. He's not animal. Their proposal is from lower to the higher, but our theory is from the higher, from Visnu. Krsna says, aham sarvasya prabhavah. "I am the origin of everything." Now, how you can say there is development from the lower creatures? He is the origin. And Vedanta says, janmady asya yatah. The origin, Absolute Truth, is that from whom everything is generating. So Absolute Truth means He is the supreme life. From life, life is coming. Where is the evidence that dead stone giving birth to a man or animal? Where is the evidence?
Syamasundara: His idea is that in future everyone will be a demigod, that the race of man, because of mental life, will be replaced by a race of superconscious beings.
Prabhupada: Superconscious beings, there are already existing, just like in Siddhaloka and Gandharvaloka. There are many planets.
Syamasundara: This earth planet will become like that.
Prabhupada: No. We don't get such information. Why they are so much anxious about the earth planet? There are many millions of  planets. So super human being there... Just like we learn from the sastras, in the Siddhaloka they can fly from one planet to another. Not only that, all the yogic siddhis, they are, naturally they have got. Just like we are trying to fly in the sky, that is not natural, but a small bird, he can fly. It is God's creation. So similarly, there are many human beings in the Siddhaloka. They, without any airplane, without any..., they can fly. They go from one planet to another. Not that this, from this planet they have developed. They are already existing.
Syamasundara: His idea is that nature develops towards that point. The body develops better and better to that point.
Prabhupada: That is another..., the same rascal proposal. Body never develops. There are different types of body and the soul take shelter of one particular body. The same example, that in the tailor shop there are many shirts and coats. It is not that a shirt is developing into coat, neither the coat is developed into shirt. But there are many varieties of shirts and coat. If you go, you put on, and when the shirt or coat moves, the rascal thinks that it is the shirt and coat is moving. Shirt and coat never moves. The man, or the living entity, within the shirt and coat, he is moving. And therefore as soon as he is out, the shirt and coat, this body, is dead. It has no value.
Syamasundara: So according to the desire of the soul, he...
Prabhupada: Yes. That is the statement in the Bhagavata. Karmana daiva netrena jantor dehopapattaye. Karmana. Just like you get a shirt and coat according to the price you pay, similarly, by your karma, you get a particular type of body.
Syamasundara: So if one was prepared to pay for such demigod existence, he could have it.
Prabhupada: Yes. Demigod... That is called punya-karma. Just like they are going to Candraloka. According to Vedic scripture, yanti deva-vrata devan. If you worship the particular demigods, then you are promoted in that loka.
Syamasundara: It's not that accidentally nature will evolve a race of demigods on this planet.
Prabhupada: No, no. There is nothing accidental. It is not that accidental, one becomes high court judge. (laughter) This is nonsense. Accidental(ly) one becomes a very high grade medical man. This is all childish proposal. They have no sense even. It is all childish. Where is the, in our practical life, where is the evidence that accidentally one has become like this? Is there any evidence of how they propose these childish things? I do not know. And they are passing as philosophers.
Syamasundara: Occasionally, for instance, there will be some great genius born in a family, and they will say that somehow or other, nature has produced this genius. The parents are not so intelligent.
Prabhupada: No. Genius means he, in his previous life, he cultured, and next life is being manifested. Just like in the Bhagavad-gita it is said, sucinam srimatam gehe yogo bhrastah sanjayate. So yoga-bhrastah, one who could not finish his yogic activities perfectly, he is given chance. Sucinam srimatam gehe. Not that accidental.
Syamasundara: So through the practice of some kind of yoga system, men develop higher consciousness.
Prabhupada: Yes. This is also, we are practicing, bhakti-yoga.
Syamasundara: Otherwise...
Prabhupada: No. Without your... This is the thing, you have to gain by your own endeavor. Other things naturally come in. Tasyaiva hetoh prayateta kovidah. Therefore sastra says, "For that perfection, one should devote his life." Here people  are taught to struggle how to get material comforts, but according to Vedic system, material comforts you will have whatever is destined to you. But so far your spiritual development is concerned, you have to understand that you are spirit soul and you can develop yourself to go back to the spiritual world, you can be associated with the Lord. So many things, spiritual activities. So the sastra says that one should try to achieve spiritual perfection, and for that he should endeavor. Not for material comforts. Material comforts will come to you as material distress come upon you. You don't ask for material distress, but it comes. Similarly, material comforts also will come automatically. So there is no need of wasting time. Just like see in the nature there are so many millions of living entities. They have no business, they have no profession. These birds, early in the morning, they have no fixed (?) (figs?). But they know there is food somewhere. They go to a tree and enough fruits there are you eat. Ahara-nidra-bhaya-maithunam ca. They have got their nest upon the tree, and another female bird is there already. So he has sex life and they try to defend themselves in their own way. So these things, ahara-nidra-bhaya-maithunam, these four things, by nature it is already given. You haven't got to try for it. Simply you have to try for spiritual emancipation. That endeavor should be engaged.
Syamasundara: His idea is that in this higher state of consciousness, rather than just enjoying objects, that one is able to contemplate them as they are, to understand them as they are. One is able to understand objects, things, as they are. Most people are on the level... On the mental level, we are capable of enjoying objects; they give us pleasure, but we are unable to understand them as they are. But in this higher level, he says that people will be able to understand things as they are, as well as enjoy them.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is our philosophy. Just like common man is seeing a rose flower, but a devotee is studying that rose flower, "How God's energy is acting that through His energy such a nice thing has come out. Therefore it should be offered to Krsna. It is Krsna's property." Isavasyam idam sarvam. "It is Krsna's production, it is Krsna's property. So it should be offered to Krsna." And devotee, after offering it to Krsna, then, as prasadam, he smells. This is higher consciousness. In the lower consciousness: "Oh, here is a beautiful flower. Let me take it and enjoy it."
Syamasundara: Pure enjoyment without any understanding.
Prabhupada: This is the difference between lower consciousness and higher consciousness. An animal eating, he is also eating. A man is eating. The man should be developed consciousness that eatable is given by Krsna. As it is stated in the Vedas, eko bahunam vidadhati kaman. "The Supreme Lord is supplying all the necessities of life." So "Krsna has given me these necessities of life, so first of all let me offer it to Krsna." That is called yajna. That is called yajna. Yajnarthat karmano 'nyatra loko 'yam karma-bandhanah. Yajna-sistasinah santo mucyanti sarva-kilbisaih. Yajna means Visnu. For Visnu, for Krsna, everything should be done. Otherwise, he will be entanglement. So this is called higher consciousness, fructified consciousness. Just like the flower has got different stages: bud stage, then little grown, then little... Once you'll find it fully grown, nice, beautiful rose, and fragrant. That is, when a human being comes to that full grown consciousness, that is Krsna consciousness.

Syamasundara: His idea is that the whole world, the process of world evolution is moving toward that point.
Prabhupada: Yes. Toward that point, nature is giving chance, but because you are living entity, you have got independence, you may not take the chance.
Syamasundara: Your idea is more that certain individuals will attain that point, but not the world as a whole.
Prabhupada: No. World as a whole will... Just like we are... Krsna is teaching that "Surrender unto Me," but who is taking Krsna's teaching? That is independence. If Krsna is assuring that "You just surrender unto Me, and I give you protection from all resultant action of sinful activities,"... People suffer for sinful activities. Just like we are keeping the account nicely so that when we present to the government they may not see any flaw. So we are keeping account nicely. That means we are trying to save ourself from sinful activities. And if there is discrepancies in the account, that is sinful activity. So as soon as there is discrepancy, one has to suffer. So Krsna says... But the material world is so made that even if you do not want to act sinfully, unconsciously you will act so many things sinfully. Unconsciously. Even you have no desire. Just like we had done that. Unconsciously we did not take the certificate, and we are suffering. There was no intention to violate this rule, but unconsciously we did not do it. Now we have to suffer. So similarly, unconsciously or consciously, we are acting so many things sinful. Just like when you are walking on the street, you have no desire to kill animals, but on account of your walking, so many ants are being killed. So you are responsible for that. Therefore that vyadha, that hunter, he was jumping. He knows. He has become devotee. So he knows that "Any creature may not die." So he was jumping. This is Krsna consciousness. A Krsna conscious person knows that "I cannot kill even an ant." But unconsciously or consciously, we kill. Suppose we are drinking water. There are so many germs we are killing. And when you rub the spices, there are so many germs are killed. When you ignite fire, so many germs are killed. Therefore Vedic injunction is that pancasuna-yajna. You must perform yajna daily so that you may be saved from the sinful activities you have committed unconsciously. So that cannot be saved. But Krsna says that "Just surrender unto Me and I will give you protection from the resultant action of any kind of sinful activities, consciously or unconsciously." And why the people are not taking advantage of it?
Syamasundara: So you don't see that the whole world will evolve to this.
Prabhupada: No. That is a nonsense proposal. It is a nonsense proposal. Just like sometimes we are questioned by some rascals that "Swamiji, if everyone becomes God conscious, goes to back to home, then who will remain here?" (laughter) Just see the nonsense. He is anxious, who will remain here. He is not anxious for himself. (laughter) It is an argument that "Everyone becomes honest, then who will go to the jail? (laughter) To keep up the jail is very important business. You see? So these are foolish questions. You see?
Syamasundara: In his time, 1880, 1890, everyone was very optimistic about the future of man. They thought, through scientific discovery, that everyone would become...
Prabhupada: That is nonsense because they think, "Whatever we like, by nature's way we shall be promoted." Just like in some meeting in Mombassa somebody asked that, after... Some Aurobindo group, that... No, theosophist. That one man is there; he has no degree. So why not degree?

Syamasundara: ...then he goes back.
Prabhupada: Yes. If he has got elevation, he has degradation. This is common sense affairs. If you become rich, you can become poor also. Why that once you become rich and there is no question of becoming poor? Is that guaranteed? These nonsense questions are asked even by so-called theosophist and so many there are. You see. They have no common sense even.
Syamasundara: His definition of God is that God is the source in nature to support and produce values. What is good, what is true, values, this is God, the source of these values.
Prabhupada: Yes. So this is value. Krsna says, "You surrender unto Me and all questions solved." So it has value. That we also admit. But it is up to me to accept that value or not. That independence God has given me. Otherwise, everyone would have been Krsna conscious and surrendered to Krsna. Why they are not doing that? Even God is value, to accept that value depends on me.
Syamasundara: He said that God is the whole universe and that we are parts and parcels, that man is part and parcel of God.
Prabhupada: Part and parcel, that is explained in Bhagavad-gita. Every living entity. Why man? Every living entity is part and parcel. Mamaivamso jiva-bhutah. But they take that "Cow is not living entity. It has no soul. So let us eat. It is eatable." That is their nonsense philosophy. That is not fact. Everyone. Even the... All living entities are part and parcel of God.
Syamasundara: These evolutionists, they consider... They don't think there is a soul. They think that the cow is an organism, and we are just more advanced organisms. So we have the right to slaughter the cow because we are more advanced.
Prabhupada: Now, tiger is more advanced. He has the right to kill you. Why you say you are advanced? Why you ere claiming that you are advanced? When a tiger is there, he kills you and eats you. He is more advanced.
Syamasundara: He is more fit to survive.
Prabhupada: Yes. Why do they not say like that?
Syamasundara: But we have developed high powered rifles to kill tigers.
Prabhupada: Well, that is defense. So the tiger has also defense: claws and nails. So defense will be... When there is fight between man to man, does it mean because man is highly developed and he will not be killed? When there is fight between man to man there is chance of one being killed. So similarly, when there is fight between tiger and you, one being killed, what is your superiority? Simply nonsensical. Simply nonsensical. Therefore our conclusion, "Simply rascal," is perfect. Anyone who has no Krsna consciousness, he is simply rascal. That's all.
Syamasundara: He says that once one has emerged through a process of evolution, once one has emerged to the higher types of evolution or the so-called deity form, he sees that the lower deities or the inferior..., the lower organisms would strive to emulate him, to become like him. Just like the animals would strive to become like men.
Prabhupada: This is not striving. By nature's way the lower animals, they come to the platform of man. Jiva-jatisu paryayah, it is called. Paryayah means one after another. There is nature's help. Up to the human being, that law works. And human being, being developed conscious, so he has got the power of discrimination. Because originally the soul is given  independence. Just like Krsna is asking Arjuna, yathecchasi tatha kuru. "Whatever you like, you do." That is the original connection. God is the Supersoul; we are soul, under Him, subordinate. So we are called tatastha, means marginal. Marginal means we can remain either way. Either on God's side or maya's side. That is my choice. So when we don't want to serve God, then we are sent to the maya, to serve maya. Maya means his position as servant remains the same, but he thinks "I am master." That is maya. He is Just like a child trying to do something father does not like. But when he cries, he's given that. "All right. Do this." But "All right, do this" or "Do that," he is under the father. He is under the control of the father. But when he is given such chance, "Oh, I am independent now. I am independent." So this is called maya. He's never independent, but he thinks, "I am independent." Similarly, here also Just like we Indians, we have got independence. So what kind of independence? In British period there was not so much dependence. These rascal laws, that you have to go So many things. You cannot move now. In British period the Indians had independence to move all over the world by expenditure. Now we cannot go. So we have got independence, but we have become dependent in so many ways. This is called maya. So whole world, they are thinking that "I am independent. My nation is independent." Nobody is independent. Everyone is dependent under the laws of material nature. When death comes, nobody is independent. Either American, Indian, or There is no question of independence. But when we think that "I am independent," although I am dependent in so many respects, that is maya. That is maya. Maya means what he is thinking, that is not fact. That is called maya. Ma-ya. What you are thinking, that is not a fact. So daivi hy esa gunamayi mama maya duratyaya. So he is continually serving the maya, life after life, but still he is thinking, "I am independent." So the right intelligence is, actual independence is, mam eva ye prapadyante mayam etam taranti. When you surrender to Krsna, that is your real independence.
Syamasundara: His idea is that all lower forms of life strive to emulate the higher forms of life.
Prabhupada: That is natural. Everyone wants to become higher than what he is. Because he is trying to become master. He is trying to... His whole problems is that he is trying to be master. So he comes to master to some extent. Suppose he is working in an office, he is a head clerk, master of several clerks. So he is not satisfied. He wants to become a superintendent. When he becomes a superintendent, he wants to be under-secretary. When he is under-secretary, he wants to become secretary. When he becomes a secretary, he wants to become minister. When he is made minister, then he wants to be the president. And when he becomes a president, he wants to control all over the world, just like your Nixon. So this progressive ambition is there in the material world because any materialistic man is impeted with the idea that "I shall become like Krsna." So when he fails everything, then he wants to merge into the Krsna. Mayavada philosophy. Aham brahmasmi. He does not know that... He is already Brahman, but he thinks that "I am the Supreme Brahman. I am moving the sun. I am moving the..." Meditating. He is moving the sun. He is moving... Just another imitate. That is the last snare of maya. Maya is giving him allurement that "You become a minister, you become secretary, you become a big merchant, you become a Birla. You..." "Become become become." (S)he is always dictating, and he is working under the dictation of maya. The last dictation is, "Then you have failed all  these things. Better you become God." (laughter) So he thinks, "I am God." And maya is still kicking. As soon as God gets some toothache, he'll have to, another... So he goes... "After all, what kind of God you are? You come here for toothache cure." This is another man.
Syamasundara: And actually it may be true that the lower forms are trying to emulate the higher forms, but it is also the reverse is true. Just like the hippies, they are trying to emulate the hogs.
Prabhupada: Well, the hippies, they are nonsense. What is the value of their anything? They have no value. They are crazy, mad fellows. That's all. There is no philosophy, nothing of the sort.
Syamasundara: He calls... What you said is that maya is the urge within nature to desire the next step of evolution.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: He wants this, he wants that. Is that right?
Prabhupada: Next step... No. Up to human form of life, by nature one is making progress automatically. One after this, one after this. That evolution. Jalaja nava... Just like from aquatics, you become trees, plants. (aside:) Telephone. Telephone. Somebody go. From trees, you become insect. From insect, you become birds or reptiles. From birds, you become beast. From beast, you become a human being. This is going on by nature's way. Just like a goat. A goat has to live in this body for certain years. Then he becomes something, other animal, and he has to live in that body for some years. Then he becomes another body. This is change . In this way he comes to the human form of life when his consciousness is developed. Now, when... Amongst the human form of life, there are many species of human form of life. So when one comes to..., I may say, in India, when he's born in India, that is the highest perfectional point because there is Vedic knowledge. So he can take advantage of the Vedic knowledge. And by taking advantage of Vedic knowledge, he understands that "I am part and parcel of God. Therefore my real business is to go back to God. Why I am suffering in this material world?" That is perfectional stage.
Syamasundara: But the urge to improve oneself, to attain the next stage...
Prabhupada: This is the urge for improvement. Krsna says, God says, that "All living entities are My part and parcels." This instruction can be accepted only by human beings, not the cats and dogs. Although He claims that "Every living entity is My part and parcel," the cats and dogs, they have no capacity to understand these, I mean to say, utterances of the Personality of Godhead. Even he has got an ear. You are hearing, a dog may hear. But you can capture; the dog cannot capture. Due to his lower grade of body, he cannot. So in this higher grade of body, the Vedic instructions are there. Now you can make your choice. Yathecchasi tatha kuru. As Krsna says to Arjuna that "Whatever you like you can do." So now it depends upon you. If you don't accept the real progressive life, understand Krsna and surrender unto Him, then you will go back.
Syamasundara: Is it not that because our real nature is perfect that we're always striving to become perfect again? Striving to reach that point again?
Prabhupada: Yes, your nature is perfect. Perfect means you have got independence also. So you can perfectly misuse also, independence. That is perfect.
Syamasundara: But there is always that urge, even among the  lower animals, to improve themselves, be promoted.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is being done by nature. That is evolution. Darwin has taken this idea from the Vedas, but he has no soul idea.
Syamasundara: But he mentions the point, what is that urge? Why do I want to improve? What is that urge that makes me want to...
Prabhupada: It is not his urge. Nature is giving him the impetus. Just like when you are young, there is no sex urge. When you are a small boy, there is no sex urge, but as soon as you come to a certain stage, say, sixteen years, you immediately... The sex urge is there within you, but it was not developed in your childhood. But as soon as you go, come to the youth-hood, there is. Similarly, the perfection of consciousness is there, but unless you come to the stage of human being, that is not developed.
Syamasundara: In the animals it may take the form of trying to survive. That's all. The animals want to survive. They want to live.
Prabhupada: Their only business is how to eat, how to sleep. Where to get eating, eatable things. That is their business. They have no other business.
Syamasundara: It is said that the low form of striving to improve...
Prabhupada: That is struggle for existence you can say. They are simply trying to live. They have no other ambition. That's all. But if a man..., if the living soul, after having come to the stage of human being, if he also simply tries for these four things, eating, sleeping, mating and defending, then he is no better than animal. So nowadays in the modern civilization, simply these things are taught: how you can live comfortably with a car, with a bungalow...
Syamasundara: So the urge, the urge to improve or to advance...
Prabhupada: (aside, Hindi:) Aiye aiye. Give them something, sitting place. Hare Krsna.
Syamasundara: The urge to advance is there in the human more developed. How does that...?
Prabhupada: You can give this side. This side. Yes. Why not this fan is running? What is that? All right. Let them sit.
Syamasundara: In the human beings, we can see that everyone has the urge to become something better or something more.
Prabhupada: Thank you. Hare Krsna. Jaya. They can understand English. Ah, yes.
Syamasundara: We notice that in all human entities there is an urge to advance or improve oneself, to become something more.
Prabhupada: Yes. Yes. That I have already explained. Because all living entities have come into this material world, their propensity is to enjoy. Enjoy. So he is enjoying one standard of life in one stage of life. But he wants more, better standard. Better standard. The spirit is enjoyment. That is the disease of material science.
Syamasundara: So the urge has become perverted. The urge to advance has become perverted to the urge to enjoy.
Prabhupada: Yes, perverted, perverted. His position is to serve, but... He is serving his senses, but he's thinking that "I am enjoying." This is called maya. Actually, he is serving his senses. Just see, to enjoy, to make money, how much they are working hard, day and night. Yan maithunadi-grhamedhi-sukham hi tuccham kanduyanena karayor iva duhkha-duhkham. They are working so hard, but because there is hope that "I shall become millionaire," he is thinking happy. Actually, he is working very  hard. More than an animal. More than an animal. Animals, they work hard, but as soon as they get some food they are satisfied. But human being is not satis He will eat only that four chapatis, but he is not satisfied. That is the nature's. The Bhagavata says that human being is so passionate that he works hard, very hard, and he thinks that "I am happy." He thinks, "I am happy."
Syamasundara: This urge to become something more is bad.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is maya. That is maya. He cannot be happy in any position. He cannot be happy. But he thinks that "I'll be happy. If I go to that place, or that position." Just like the modern scientists, they have finished their all happiness here. Now they are, they are trying, "If we go to Candraloka, then we shall be happy."
Syamasundara: But isn't this urge to advance... He says this urge to advance is the desire to become godly.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: Everyone wants to become godly...
Prabhupada: No, no. The desire, desire means that he has lost his real happiness. His real happiness is with God, dancing with God. Just like gopis, they are dancing with God. That is real happiness. That is his nature. Anandamayah abhyasat. Vedanta-sutra says that "By nature he wants ananda, ananda." But because he is seeking ananda in a perverted way, he is being confused and frustrated. Therefore he is thinking "Not this stage, that stage will give me happiness." So when he goes to that stage, he again finds unhappiness. Because he is wrongly selecting, that "This is the stage of my happiness."
Syamasundara: And then eventually he'll reach the point where he realizes, "All that is unhappiness," and then he will turn to Krsna consciousness.
Prabhupada: No. Therefore Krsna says, the most confidential part of knowledge, that sarva-dharman parityajya mam ekam saranam vraja. This will give you happiness because constitutionally you are made like that. Therefore in the Vaikunthaloka there is happiness, eternal happiness because they are all surrendered to Krsna. Just like in Vrndavana. Vrndavana, ell the gopis, all the cowherd boys, all the cows, all the trees, everyone--simply center is Krsna. How Krsna will be happy.
Syamasundara: So everyone is striving to return to that stage...
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: ...and they have simply perverted their drive...
Prabhupada: Therefore they are confused and frustrated. This is called maya.
Syamasundara: Their advancement is misplaced.
Prabhupada: Bhaktivinoda Thakura sings, mayar bose yaccho bese kacho habudubu bhai. Just like one man is being carried away by the waves and he is sometimes dipping, sometimes coming out, sometimes dipping, sometimes So our position is like that, that we are being carried away by the waves of this material nature and we are sometimes being drowned, sometimes coming out. When we come out, we breathe little. We think, "We are now happy." He forgets that "Again I shall have to be drowned." So in this way we struggle. This is called struggle for existence. And "fittest" means when we come to Krsna consciousness and surrender unto Krsna, then our fitness is spiritual. That's all.
Syamasundara: But still, there is that urge to become godly, to be godlike.

Prabhupada: Yes. He is godly. Aham brahmasmi. That is the realization, "I am Brahman." But he is thinking "I am matter. I am this body." That is the cause of his unhappiness.
Syamasundara: So this urge is what's propels all of evolution. Everyone is striving to advance back to that stage of Godhead.
Prabhupada: Yes, nature, in lower life, lower animal life, nature is giving him, "Yes, you come to this, come to this, come to this, come to this." Like that.
Syamasundara: He says that the next stage of evolution, the qualities of the next stage we cannot know at this point.
Prabhupada: No. He cannot... He does not know, but we know. (chuckles) He has no... He is unfortunate. He has no connection with Krsna; therefore he does not know. But one who has got Krsna as his master, as his teacher, he knows everything. Yasmin vijnate sarvam evam vijnatam bhavanti. This is the Vedic injunction. If you simply understand Krsna, then you understand everything. That's all.
Syamasundara: He says that man, being a part of God, that he is capable of cooperating with God to make further progress in the universe.
Prabhupada: That is... Yes. That is his life, to cooperate with God. That is his real life. But here in this material world he is simply noncooperating. He's simply noncooperating. Unless he is noncooperating, why Krsna says that "You surrender unto Me." That is simply noncoop... Anything here, karma, jnana, yoga, anything... Other animal life, you throw away. Even in the higher level of human life, where karma is regulated, jnana is there, knowledge is there, and yoga is there, but because there is no surrender to Krsna, they will not help you to become happy. So that... Caitanya-caritamrta says bhukti-mukti-siddhi-kami sakale asanta. Asanta means restless. Restless. Bhukti means karmis. They want simply sense enjoyment. They are called karmis. And mukti, the jnanis, they want mukta, mukti. So they also want something. The karmis, they want everything for sense gratification. When they fail sense gratification, then one wants mukti. That is also another demand. Another demand. Ordinarily, they are demanding, "Give me nice building. Give me nice motor car, nice wife, nice money, bank balance, give me this, give me this, give me this." Dhanam dehi rupam dehi rupapati bhajam dehi yaso dehi. Dehi dehi dehi. This is karmi. And when he is frustrated, after asking many, many times, even becoming Birla, he is not satisfied, then next he wants, "I want mukti." That is also another demand, subtle demand. And the yogis, they also demanding, "Give me this mystic power. I shall become smaller than the smallest, heavier than the heaviest. I can fly. I can walk over the water." These are yoga-siddhis, eight kind of yoga-siddhis. So they are also demanding. Only krsna-bhakta niskama ataeva santa. Krsna bhakta has no demand. "Sir, I am your eternal servitor. I surrender unto You. Now you do whatever you like with me." So therefore he has no demand. So only Krsna bhakta can be peaceful. No other else. Either karmis, jnanis, or yogis, nobody is peaceful. Krsna also says that

                     bhoktaram yajna-tapasam
                      sarva-loka-mahesvaram
                      suhrdam sarva-bhutanam
                    jnatva mam santim rcchati

This is santi. Simply by understanding Krsna, that He is the  supreme enjoyer, bhokta, He is the supreme proprietor, and He is the supreme friend, then he becomes santa. That is peacefulness.
Syamasundara: He says that man should cooperate with God to usher in the next stage of higher consciousness.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Syamasundara: And in this respect man is responsible for evolution. Man...
Prabhupada: Well, when we speak of... When he is prepared to cooperate with God, that is the highest evolution. That is the highest... Nobody wants to cooperate with God. Everyone wants to noncooperate with God.
Syamasundara: He says it's within man's hands, that man is responsible for the next stage of evolution.
Prabhupada: What is that next stage of evolution? If he surrenders, that is the highest evolution, highest platform. Then simply enjoyment. There is no more evolution. Evolution, aradhito yadi haris tapasa tatah kim. If you have come to the point to worship the Supreme Lord, aradhito yadi haris, then there is no more question of evolution. Tapasa tatah kim. Tapasa, tapasya, austerity, penance, they are required for elevation. So aradhito yadi haris tapasa tatah kim. When you are engaged in Krsna's service, there is no more question of evolution. That is the highest evolution. And Bhagavad-gita also says,

                       mam ca 'vyabhicarini
                     bhakti-yogena yah sevate
                      sa gunan samatityaitan
                      brahma-bhuyaya kalpate

He is already Brahman. Anyone who is engaged in the service of the Lord, avyabhicarini, without any adulteration, pure devotion, then he is already Brahman. He hasn't got to seek for again becoming Brahman. Mam ca 'vyabhicarini bhakti-yogena yah sevate, sa gunan sama... He immediately transcends all the three gunas, the sattva-guna, rajo-guna, tamo-guna. And brahma-bhuyaya kalpate, he is Brahman. Without becoming Brahman, how he can serve the Supreme Brahman?
Syamasundara: So the next stage of evolution, if it is to be higher stage than the present man...
Prabhupada: Higher stage, that evolution they do not know. Just like in Vaisnava philosophy, santa dasya sakhya vatsalya madhurya. The first, when you have come brahma-bhutah stage, that is called santa. "Oh, God is..." Vasudevah sarvam iti sa mahatma su-durlabhah. When one understands. Bahunam janmanam ante, after many, many births, when one comes to this conclusion that "Vasudeva, Krsna is everything," sa mahatma su-durlabhah, that is santa stage, mahatma, great soul. Then, from santa stage, the development is dasya stage, to serve Krsna. Not simply appreciating Vasudeva. "Vasudeva is great, God is so great." Not so much, simply appreciation. "Oh, God is so great? Then I must give some service to God." That is next stage. Dasya-rasa. Then next stage is vatsalya-rasa..., sakhya-rasa, to give service to God just like Arjuna. Arjuna gave service to Krsna but as a friend. That is called sakhya-rasa. Then vatsalya-rasa, to give service to Krsna just like mother Yasoda. She has become mother. Mother gives always service to the baby, his (her) child, and Krsna is passing His childhood pastimes before mother Yasoda. Mother  Yasoda is always thinking, "Krsna is hungry. Oh, Krsna is getting skinny. I must feed Him. I must protect Him from the monkeys. I must protect Him from fire." Always anxious how to give protection to Krsna. Krsna is giving protection everyone, but the devotee has become so great that Krsna is taking his protection, her protection. Then, after vatsalya, then madhurya-rasa, the gopis or girlfriends. And of all of them, Radharani is the highest. She is trying to make happy Krsna in so many ways, sixty-four arts: how to dance, how to cook, how to make peace, how to smile, and Krsna is captivated by Radharani. Therefore the devotee says Krsna is Madana-Mohana, He can captivate Madana. But Radharani is Madana-Mohana-Mohini. She captivates even Madana-Mohana. That is the highest stage of maha-bhava, Radharani's stage. So in the spiritual life there are so many developments. Although there is no difference. It is not that those who are serving Krsna as friends just like cowherds boy, and as Radharani is serving Krsna as consort, there is no difference in value, but spiritually there is estimation of value. Radharani's stage is the highest stage.
Syamasundara: So if this platform of consciousness is to be attained by everyone, it is the responsibility of men to cooperate with God...
Prabhupada: Yes. That cooperation begins when God says that "You surrender unto Me," and if he agrees, that cooperation begins.
Syamasundara: In other words, it won't happen automatically.
Prabhupada: Unless you surrender, where is the cooperation? Where is the cooperation? Just like all my disciples, because they have surrendered, so there is cooperation. Therefore this movement is increasing. Otherwise, alone what can we do? Because you are cooperating with me, therefore I am advancing this movement. If you noncooperate with me, I am old man. What can I do? So similarly, Lord Caitanya comes, Krsna, to invite cooperation. He says that "Please cooperate with me. Let me spread this Krsna consciousness."
Syamasundara: He says that there is freedom of the will in two different senses. One, activity that is surely not subject to compulsion by extraneous forces, and... Activity that is merely not subject to compulsion by extraneous forces, and expression of integrated, self-directing persons acting in a purposeful, coherent way in order to serve the best interest of all. In other words there is the freedom of the will, which is merely not subject to extraneous forces, and there is also the self-directing free will, who is aware of ethical values, and he is...
Prabhupada: That two cooperation, two kinds of cooperation is going on. Just like in a state a citizen is cooperating as a free citizen. The same citizen is cooperating in the prison by force. The jail superintendent says, "Now you break these bricks." He has to do; otherwise he'll be punished. He is cooperating by force. But this cooperation is inferior cooperation. Therefore Caitanya Mahaprabhu says, jivera svarupa haya nitya krsna dasa. By constitutional position, a living entity is eternal servant of Krsna. In the Vaikuntha jagat, the cooperation, the service is voluntary. And here in this material world the service is forced because it is maya. Just like in the jail the service is there. One who declares that "I don't care for the government. I break all the laws." But he is put into jail. There is no question of breaking the laws, but by law he has to work forcibly. He  has to do it. So here in this material world we are working under force of maya. That is called daivi hy esa gunamayi mama maya duratyaya. That force you cannot avoid. You cannot avoid. Only you can avoid when you voluntarily cooperate with Krsna. Mam eva ye prapadyante mayam etam taranti te.
Syamasundara: He's using the sense of free will in two senses. Just like I would drive down the right side of the road because I know that it's the law. So I want to obey the law. And then the other sense would be I want to drive down the right side of the street in order not to harm anyone and for so many other reasons, a higher type of use of free will. One is automatic, one is more thoughtful.
Prabhupada: So automatic cooperation is bhakti, and forced cooperation is karma. That is the... It looks the same thing. Karmis and the bhaktas are working... Just like we are working in the same way. Karmi is typing and a bhakta is typing. It looks the same thing, but karmi is typing under force. His master has ordered, "You work it; otherwise you won't get salary." And a bhakta is typing for pleasing Krsna and for glorifying Krsna. So the typing looks the same, but the bhakta's typing and a karmi's typing different.
Syamasundara: And he says that freedom of the will is relative, that in our higher level it becomes clear that the lower stage was actually determined, predetermined or directed by external forces.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is called karma-phala. That we have explained. Karmana daiva-netrena. Unless superior superintendence he is working, and as a result of his work, he is getting a particular type of body for enjoyment or suffering.
Syamasundara: Even though he thinks he's free. He thinks he's free.
Prabhupada: Yes. That is also explained in the Bhagavad-gita.

                       prakrteh kriyamanani
                     gunaih karmani sarvasah
                       ahankara-vimudhatma
                       kartaham iti manyate

He is being forced by the laws of nature, but he is thinking, "I am doing this." That is ahankara-vimudhatma. He's a rascal.
Syamasundara: This man, Alexander, says that in the higher levels of evolution one can see that everything is determined in the lower levels.
Prabhupada: Yes. Therefore... Everything is determined; therefore we should not try for improving our economic condition because already it is decided. This sort of... Otherwise why you see so many varieties of standard of life? One is born rich and one born, he is working so hard, he cannot get even two morsel of bread. So everything is determined. Therefore Bhagavata says that "For this material happiness, you don't try. That will come automatically as distress comes automatically." You don't try for distress, but it comes upon you. Similarly, whatever happiness is due to you, it will also come to you. You try for developing your Krsna consciousness. That is your business. Tasyaiva hetoh prayeteta kovidah. That is intelligence.
Syamasundara: He says that values are relative between a particular man and a particular object that one man's food is another man's poison.
Prabhupada: Yes. Just like we have taken, Krsna consciousness  has value and material consciousness no value. So value also different according to the different persons.
Syamasundara: And he says the basis for determining or judging which values are best is by the principle of coherence, that is, by agreement among the most people willing to accept it.
Prabhupada: That means authority. What is value. Just like Caitanya Mahaprabhu says that "You become Krsna bhakta," because He is authority. The Veda says vedais ca sarvair aham eva vedyam. Veda says that "Search out Krsna." So the authority, what the authority says, that is valuable.
Syamasundara: But he says not the authority. He says by the most willing people...
Prabhupada: That we see... He's going... He's going... Veda is accept by everyone. All learned scholar. Who can decry Vedas? Only the rascals will decry Vedas. Otherwise... Just like in our country, India, all the big acaryas, they accept Vedas as the basic principle. So who can decry? Veda says that the stool of cow is pure, and it is accepted. Everyone. All Hindus, brahmanas, ksatriyas, vaisyas, and the acaryas, they accept that cow dung is pure. Why? Veda says. In another place, Veda says that "Stool of any animal is impure," but this stool is pure. So we haven't got discrimination. We accept that. Other animal stool is impure. But the cow dung, the stool of cow, we immediately accept as pure, and we apply it in our Deity room and make is purified. That is Veda. You cannot contradict . You cannot argue Vedas. That is also...
Syamasundara: But his idea is that the majority will accept something.
Prabhupada: Well, in India majority accepts Veda. Now they have become rascals, that is a different thing.
Syamasundara: Now they accept wine...
Prabhupada: That is a different thing. But in India all the authorities, all personalities, unless you accept Vedas, you are called nastika. Therefore Buddha philosophy was driven away, Caitanya Mahaprabhu veda na maniya bauddha haila nastika. Simply Lord Buddha says, "I don't care for your Vedas." Lord Buddha wanted to preach nonviolence, but in the Vedic literature there is violence. There is violence. Just like Gandhi wanted to prove from Bhagavad-gita nonviolence. Where is nonviolence there? Where is that nonviolence? Krsna is inducing Arjuna to fight, to become violent. So how can you prove there is nonviolence? These are all nonsense. So similarly, in the Vedas there is recommendation that animals can be sacrificed in the Vedas with mantra. That... Therefore the process, to test the power of the mantra, that animal is put into the fire and the animal again comes out with a new life. That is the test. Just like you test how the microphone is working. So how the Vedic mantras are being chanted rightly, that is tested by putting... Just like in laboratory a small animal is killed. But that is killed. They cannot give life. But here, in sacrifice, asvamedha-yajna, gomedha-yajna, there is... Gavalambham, asvamedham gavalambham. The animal sacrificed, but it comes again with ill life. That is the test, how the Vedic mantra is chanted. So because there is no such qualified brahmana, therefore in this age all kinds of sacrifices stopped. So Veda is no authority. The mantra has no life. So that is accepted by everyone. At least, civilized class of men. Actually, unless there is this varnasrama-dharma, the classification of brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya, that is not civilized form of life. So according to Vedic conception, the modern civilization, European, American, that not civilized form of... And actually it is  happening. The result is producing. And because India accepted the Vedic culture, in spite of two thousand years onslaught by foreigners, they are standing still. Many of them fallen, but the basic principle is still standing. Just like we are teaching Krsna consciousness on the basis of Vedic principle. I have not manufactured anything. And it is becoming successful. So the Vedas is so nice. Even foreigners are accepting the principle.
Syamasundara: So if the majority of the whole world accepted Krsna consciousness, then he would call that of value.
Prabhupada: No, the majority may not accept. You see, if you want to sell jewels, a diamond, you cannot get many customers. That is not possible. But still, diamond is diamond. It may not have many customers. It doesn't matter. If there is one customer, that is sufficient. Ekas candras tamo hanti na ca tarah sahasrasah. If there is one moon in the sky that is sufficient to dissipate all darkness. There is no need of thousands or millions of stars. So our movement, if anyone, through all men in the world, can understand Krsna consciousness, he will do tremendous good to the people. My Guru Maharaja used to say like that.
Syamasundara: So he searched around for those values that are most accepted by the most people and he found they are truth, beauty, and goodness are the three main values. Truth, beauty, and goodness.
Prabhupada: Well, it is a false proposition. In the material world nobody likes truth. They always want to place untruth, at least in this age. The majority of people are not truthful. As soon as one becomes truthful, he's a brahmana. (end)

Charles Darwin and the Evolutionists - Conversation Two

Charles Darwin Conversation Two

Hayagriva: This is Darwin. Darwin's conception of evolution rests on the contention that there is a real genetic change from generation to generation. In other words, Darwin rejects the platonic igos. Igos is the Greek for idea, type or essence. There is no human igos, human type or essence. There are no fixed species. This is in contradistinction to the platonic idea that the species exist in essence or, as Krsna says in Bhagavad-gita, bijam, "I am the seed of all existences." Darwin would not recognize any bijam, or seed, particular type for any species. Rather, he sees shifting, evolving physical forms constantly changing.
Prabhupada: The different forms are already there. Just like the form of monkeys also there, the form of man is also there, other animals, other birds, beasts. So he has no clear conception how the evolution is taking place, neither he has any idea about whose evolution. He simply takes account of the body. A body never evolves. It is the soul within the body--he evolves, transmigrates from one body to another. Just we see that a child becomes a boy. The..., if the child is dead, it no more evolves. So it is the soul that is concerned. The soul is within the body, and he desires and evolves. That is Vedic conception and that is life. For example, if a man is within an apartment, the man desires to change the apartment to another apartment, it does not mean that the apartment evolves, but the man desires a change, and he goes to different apartment. That is (indistinct). So Darwin has no such conception. He has described the idea of evolution from the Vedas in his own way.
Hayagriva: At first Darwin was a Christian, but his faith in the existence of a personal God dwindled, and he finally wrote, "The whole subject"--that is the subject of religion, or God--"is beyond the scope of man's intellect. The mystery of the beginning of things is insoluble by us, and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic. I have steadily endeavored to keep my mind free, so as to give up any hypothesis, however much beloved, as soon as facts are shown to be opposed to it." So he didn't argue against Plato or Descartes or Kant or any other philosopher, but he simply presented what evidence he had amassed during a five..., only a five-year voyage, on a British freighter, oh, from 1831 to 1836. But what is considered important is that his book, The Origin of Species, marks what they call the emancipation of science from philosophy.
Prabhupada: What is that, emancipation?
Hayagriva: That is to say he simply presented what material he found--that is the fossils. He investigated certain life forms on these island during this trip and theorized about evolution.
Prabhupada: That is philosophic; that is not scientific. He found something and he based his thesis on that. He cannot find out all the bodies, because there are, at the end, some section, some sect they burn the body. So how he can get information of their body, burned? So his theory is not at all scientific. It is always defective.
Hayagriva: He spent the rest of his life writing about the material he gathered during this five-year voyage, which is a very short time. And according to his theory of natural selection, the best and the fittest survived. If this is the case, the race will necessarily steadily improve.
Prabhupada: What does he mean by survive? What is the meaning of his dictionary, "survive"? Nobody survives.

Hayagriva: Well, by that he means that the strong pass on their hereditary characteristics to their offspring, and that the race..., no individual survives, but that the race improves. But isn't this contradicted by the Vedas? In the present Kali... For instance, Arjuna's physical powers, prowess, was much greater, and that was, what, five thousand years ago. So isn't, instead of improving, instead of the race improving in strength and other qualities, isn't it actually...
Prabhupada: They are degrading.
Hayagriva: ...degenerating. What is the cause of man's physical, mental and spiritual deterioration in the succeeding yugas?
Prabhupada: That is education. Every individual person, he is a soul, and he has got a particular type of body. Especially in the human body he requires education. What is this animal and what is higher than human race, these are Vedic description. So there are 8,400,000 different forms of life, and the body is being evolved. The body is machine, and the individual soul desires and he gets a suitable body made by material nature under the order of God. This is Vedic idea, as it is said in the Bhagavad-gita, isvarah sarva-bhutanam hrd-dese arjuna tisthati. God is existing within the core of everyone's heart, and the individual soul is desiring something, and upon the order God he is given a machine made by material nature. So this is evolution, and even a man, although he is human form of body, he can again degenerate to animal form of body according to his desire. Tatha dehantara-praptih. He has to change the body, and the body is changed according to his work and desire. In the animal kingdom they have also desires, but they are under the laws of nature changing body, and one is given the chance to become a human being, and then he may desire, and according to his desires he gets the next body. If he likes, he can go higher forms of life, and if he degenerates he goes lower form of life.
Hayagriva: But as the yugas progress, the human body itself, doesn't it become more degraded?
Prabhupada: What do you mean by degraded? He has got human body, but by his work and by his desire he can get next life a demigod's body or a dog's body. That will depend on his activities. Human body is meant for understanding God and act accordingly to go back to home, back to Godhead. But if he does not utilize this human form of body properly, if he remains on the platform of animal propensities and degenerates, then he goes..., he can become next life a dog, a cat. There are two things: elevation or degeneration.
Hayagriva: In The Descent of Man Darwin writes, "The belief in God has often been advanced as not only the greatest but the most complete of all the distinctions between man and the lower animals. It is, however, impossible to maintain that this belief is instinctive in man. The idea of a universal and beneficent creator does not seem to arise in the mind of man until he has been elevated by long, continued culture."
Prabhupada: Yes. The culture is important. If he gets the chance of cultured association, then he elevates. That is explained in the Bhagavad-gita: yanti deva-vrata devan. If he, according to his cultural life, he can go to the higher planetary system, he can remain where he is, he can degrade, and he can go back to home, back to Godhead. Therefore culture is very important in human form of life.
Hayagriva: He further writes, "He who believes in the advancement of man from some low organized form will naturally ask, 'How does this bear on the belief in the immortality of the soul?' " He says, "At what precise period does a man become an  immortal being?" That is to say, he doesn't know at what stage the immortal soul inhabits the species.
Prabhupada: Yes, soul is always important. He is put into different bodies. That is the defect of Darwin's knowledge. He does not know about the soul. So the existence of soul, to understand this is the first education. One who does not know this, he remains animal, sa eva go-kharah, if one continues the bodily concept of life without any understanding of the soul. And it is very easy to understand that the child is becoming boy, a boy is becoming young man. So the soul is there, and we remember that "I was a child, I was a boy, I was a young man." So I continue to exist, the bodily changes, and this is confirmed in every Vedic scripture, and that is the beginning of knowledge. If one does not understand how the soul is changing body, he remains on the level of cats and dogs.
Hayagriva: He does..., he says he doesn't know at what point the soul enters, but the soul is in anything that moves. Is that correct?
Prabhupada: Hm?
Hayagriva: Even a...
Prabhupada: The soul moves.
Hayagriva: ...bacteria for instance, or an ant.
Prabhupada: So ant moves because there is soul; the bacteria moves there because there is soul. Similarly, the man moves because there is soul. An animal moves because there is soul.
Hayagriva: And every soul is immortal.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Hayagriva: So that's all, on Darwin. (break) This is an appendix to the Darwin. In 1925 the Tennessee legislature passed the Butler Act, forbidding the teaching of Darwinism, Darwinian evolution, in the public schools of that state. In May, John Thomas Scopes, a science teacher at Dayton High School, consented to be the defendant in a court test of the law. He was arrested and indicted by a Grand Jury and stood trial on July 1925.
Prabhupada: Why he was arrested?
Hayagriva: For teaching Darwinism. For teaching that man descended from the apes.
Prabhupada: So he was teaching, and the government arrested him?
Hayagriva: The government, the American government, arrested, yes. The Tennessee legislature arrested him. He was arrested and defended by Clarence Darrow, famous trial lawyer, and the prosecutor was William Jennings Bryan, who was a thrice defeated Presidential candidate. So they discussed evolution and religion and how they could co-exist, and Scopes, who was teaching Darwinian evolution, claimed, "All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship almighty God according to the dictates of his own conscience. No human authority can in any case whatever control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and that no preference should ever be given by law to any religious establishment or mode of worship."
Prabhupada: This is, this worship and the concept of worship, if actually one believes or knows, so the real worship is that which pleases God. If you manufacture... Just like I want a glass of water, and if my servant gives me a glass of hot milk, is that worship? Worship means what I want, if you give me, then I am satisfied. But if I want a cold glass of water, you give me..., if you think, "No. Milk is better than water," so that, will that satisfy me? So these concocted ideas of worshiping will actually satisfy God, that is wrong theory, that one can worship  God according to his own dictation. That means his God is fictitious. He has no idea of God. And he can concoct ideas. But actually if there is God, one should worship according to the dictation of God. But if he does not know what is God, what is the dictation of God, then he is a rascal. What is the use of his so-called worship? It may be to some extent a sentiment, but that is not worship. If you want to worship God, you must worship God according to His dictation. That is real worship. How he can manufacture the way of worship?
Hayagriva: The prosecutor...
Prabhupada: What will be the answer? If you want to worship God, you must worship according to the dictation of God. If you have no such dictation, if you have no idea of God, then how you can worship God? You can worship a ghost, according unto you. If freedom is given to your conception, then you can worship a dog instead of God, because you do not know what is God and what God wants you to do. So without the conception of God, real, how one can worship God by whimsical ideas?
Hayagriva: This has always been a very touchy subject in the schools.
Prabhupada: This is the real subject.
Hayagriva: In the schools, now in the United States, the schools are not even allowed to mention God, not even allowed to mention God.
Prabhupada: That means that is frustration. They could not get the idea of God. This is frustration. This kind of conclusion means they try to understand God, but there was no proper understanding of God, so they have given up the idea of understanding God. So frustration, rejection by frustration is not success. The best thing is they should learn about God from God and do accordingly. That is success. So we are preaching the message of God, and people should take to it to understand God and worship Him. That is success.
Hayagriva: Bryan, the prosecutor, chastised the Darwinists for not telling us where life began and at the same time speaking of evolution. He says, "They do not dare to tell you that it began with God and ended with God. Darwin says, 'In the beginning of all things is a mystery insoluble by us.' He does pretend to say how these things started." And he goes on...
Prabhupada: That means imperfect knowledge. We say that material world is creation, and within the material world the living entities are allowed to act. So the living entities coming from God; therefore He says bijo aham. So God... Just like our life begins from the womb of the mother, but the father gives the bija. The mother's womb cannot produce itself; then there was no need of father. The father gives the bija and the mother gives the body. Similarly, the living entity, part and parcel of God, is put into the material nature, and according to his desire the material nature gives him a body. That is the beginning. Very simple thing. But these people, on account of insufficient knowledge they cannot understand what is the beginning, either Darwin or the opposite. This is the beginning. The material nature is created by God, and the living entities, who are part and parcel of God, desire to enjoy this material nature, so God impregnated material nature with the living entities. This is the beginning.
Hayagriva: Bryan had the...
Prabhupada: Who can say against this statement of Vedas? This is the beginning of life. But none of them, both the contending parties, had clear idea what is the beginning. This is the beginning.

Hayagriva: Yes. Bryan had difficulty in attacking Darwinism because he based his arguments...
Prabhupada: Darwin says he does not know the beginning.
Hayagriva: He based his arguments strictly on the Bible, Bryan. This is not Darwin, but the prosecutory.
Prabhupada: What they... What is the beginning of Bible?
Hayagriva: And he, he was ridiculed, Bryan, for his fundamental..., for his fundamentalism. The Bible says, "And God said let us make man in our image," etc. "God created man in His own image, and the image of God created He him," etc., and the Bible fixes the creation at about six thousand years ago, but science fixes, oh, ancient civilizations of China and India, oh, six thousand, seven thousand years ago, much... And the Vedas deal with a much, much broader time span.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Hayagriva: So...
Prabhupada: So it is not the question of...
Hayagriva: ...it was extremely difficult for Bryan to maintain any kind of prosecution with these...
Prabhupada: But because both, we say that both of them are ignorant about the beginning. So if both of them are ignorant, so either you say six thousand, seven thousand, or six million, this is all imagination. It is not fact. But the six thousand or seven thousand, that is not the fact--millions and millions of years. But the fact is this, that God created this cosmic manifestation, and He impregnated the living entities to appear in different types of body according to the soul's desire. That I have already explained. The soul... "Man proposes; God disposes." Not only human form of life but all the animal forms of life, they are also from the very beginning. Not like Darwin's theory that there was no human form of life in the beginning. That is a wrong theory. All the forms of life were there, and the, actually the body is external; within the body there is the soul. So the body is created by material nature and the soul is part and parcel of God. This is the real idea. So how they can refute this idea if they have no idea about the beginning of life?
Hayagriva: It was very difficult on the basis of the Bible. The Vedas date the creation back, oh...
Prabhupada: That it is a question of time, and it is the beginning.
Hayagriva: The beginning of the creation was when? No...
Prabhupada: No. There is no question of when. It may be seven thousand years or seven millions of years, but the beginning should be taken like this, that God created this cosmic manifestation. And wherefrom the living entities came? That also came from God. That is explained clearly in the Bhagavad-gita, that this material creation is composition of earth, water, air, fire..., like that, that this is also God's energy. The ingredients of this material world coming from God, that is called prakrti and pradhana. He is the creator. And then the living entities, they are also coming from God. So this material energy is explained as inferior energy, and the living entity is explained as superior energy, both of them coming from God. So the beginning of life simultaneously. It is not that matter later on developed to become life. That is a wrong theory.
Hayagriva: So, so much... It's the end of Darwin. (break) ...Thomas, Thomas Henry...
Prabhupada: In that case, all defect is that nobody could ascertain the beginning of life, but here is the solution. The beginning of life is from the very beginning of creation.

Hayagriva: Simultaneous creation.
Prabhupada: Simultaneously. That we see practically. That pregnancy, in the beginning of the body that is the beginning of life also. No that first of all one becomes pregnant and then the life comes. You have got a daily experience. Rather, the life is there, therefore the pregnancy is there. Is it not? But they say, modern rascals, that the, the body develops to a certain extent and then the life comes. So before the life coming, if the body is destroyed there is no killing. Is not that the theory at the present moment, they are killing child?
Devotee: Yes.
Prabhupada: But these foolish persons, they do not know that the body grows provided there is life; otherwise it does not grow. So life and body together. (end)